Syphilis: "The Great Imitator" Presenting as Acute Hepatitis

Introduction: Syphilis is a multi-systemic disease caused by spirochete Treponema pallidum. Very rarely, it can affect the liver and cause hepatitis. Since most cases of hepatitis are caused by viral illnesses, syphilitic hepatitis can be missed. Here, we present a case of syphilitic hepatitis in a 35-year-old male. Case Description/Methods: Patient was a 35-year-old male who presented to the hospital for jaundice and mild intermittent right upper quadrant abdominal pain. His medical history was only significant for alcohol abuse. His last drink was 4 weeks ago. He was sexually active with men. On exam, hepatomegaly, mild tenderness in the right upper quadrant, jaundice, and fine macular rash on both hands and feet were noted. Lab tests revealed an ALT of 965 U/L, AST of 404 U/L, ALP of 1056 U/L, total bilirubin of 9.5 mg/dL, direct bilirubin of 6.5 mg/dL, INR of 0.96, and albumin of 2.0 g/dL. Right upper quadrant ultrasound showed an enlarged liver but was negative for gallstones and hepatic vein thrombosis. MRI of the abdomen showed periportal edema consistent with hepatitis without any gallstones, masses, or common bile duct dilation. HIV viral load and Hepatitis C viral RNA were undetectable. Hepatitis A & B serologies were indicative of prior immunization. Hepatitis E serology and SARS-CoV-2 PCR were negative. Ferritin level was 177 ng/mL. Alpha-1-antitrypsin levels and ceruloplasmin levels were normal. Anti-Smooth muscle antibody titers were slightly elevated at 1:80 (Normal < 1:20). Anti-Mitochondrial antibody levels were also slightly elevated at 47.9 units (Normal < 25 units). RPR titer was 1:32 and fluorescent treponemal antibody test was reactive which confirmed the diagnosis of syphilis. Liver biopsy was then performed which showed presence of mixed inflammatory cells without any granulomas which is consistent with other cases of syphilitic hepatitis. Immunohistochemical stain was negative for treponemes. Patient was treated with penicillin and did have Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction. ALT, AST, ALP, and total bilirubin down trended after treatment. Repeat tests drawn exactly 1 month post treatment showed normal levels of ALT, AST, ALP, and total bilirubin (Figure). Discussion(s): Liver damage can occur in syphilis and can easily be missed because of the non-specific nature of presenting symptoms. In our patient, the fine macular rash on both hands and feet along with history of sexual activity with men prompted us to test for syphilis which ultimately led to diagnosis and treatment in a timely manner. (Figure Presented).

A simple point-of-care assay accurately detects anti-spike antibodies after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Objective: Lateral flow assays (LFA) are sensitive for detecting antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 proteins within weeks after infection. This study tested samples from immunocompetent adults, and those receiving treatments for chronic inflammatory diseases (CID), before and after mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Methods: We compared results obtained with the COVIBLOCK Covid-19 LFA to those obtained by anti-spike (S) ELISA. Results: The LFA detected anti-S antibodies in 29 of 29 (100%) of the immunocompetent and 110 of 126 (87.3%) of the CID participants after vaccination. Semiquantitative LFA scores were statistically significantly lower in samples from immunosuppressed participants, and were significantly correlated with anti-S antibody levels measured by ELISA. Conclusions: This simple LFA test is a practical alternative to laboratory-based assays for detecting anti-S antibodies after infection or vaccination. This type of test may be most useful for testing people in outpatient or resource-limited settings.

Hacettepe Health Cohort (HU-CoVaCS): Study Design, Baseline Characteristics and the First 3-Month-Follow Up of COVID-19 Vaccinated Students.

Objective: This study included participants from Hacettepe University 4th, 5th, and 6th-grade students of Medical School and 4th and 5th-grade students of Dental School;and aimed to evaluate the general health status, COVID-19 history, vaccination status, and SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels of the participants to support their physical and social health, during the pandemic period. Method(s): A prospective cohort study was conducted with an integrated, matched, nested case-control study. Sociode-mographic characteristics, life habits, COVID-19 history, vaccination status, compliance with mask-distance-hygiene rules, and risks (if any) for COVID-19 were inquired via online questionnaires. Physical examinations, complete blood count, biochemistry tests, and anti-SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibody tests were conducted for all consenting partici-pants. All analyses were established using depersonalized data. Result(s): Of the 778 participants completing the baseline visit in June-July 2021, the percentages of those vaccinated with at least one, two, and three/more doses of COVID-19 vaccine were 99.1%, 98.0%, and 11.7%, respectively;one had four doses. The median (minimum-maximum) time since the last vaccination was 134 (34-166) days for those vaccinated with two doses [CoronaVac (Sinovac Life Sciences, Beijing, China)] and 25 (14-56) days for those vaccinated with three doses [two doses of CoronaVac and a last dose of Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine (Comirnaty). The third dose was applied at a median of 164 (151-202) days after the second dose, and all were heterologous in type. The median (minimum-maximum) antibody level for the overall group was 53.55(0-5680) BAU/mL: 47.19 BAU/mL in those who received two doses, with a more than 100 times increase after a third dose (4943.64 BAU/mL). Of the 522 participants followed up to October 1, 2021, 6 PCR-positive symptomatic participants were diagnosed with COVID-19: the incidence rate was 4/1000 person-months. Conclusion(s): A 100-fold neutralizing antibody level following the third dose demonstrated the importance of a booster dose. Given the time lag between doses, antibody measurements of BioNTech recipients should be repeated in the upcoming months. Booster selection should involve antibody level, variant sensitivity of the vaccine, and individual characteristics of the recipient.Copyright © 2023, DOC Design and Informatics Co. Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests with late convalescent sera.

SARS-CoV-2-specific IgM antibodies wane during the first three months after infection and IgG antibody levels decline. This may limit the ability of antibody tests to identify previous SARS-CoV-2 infection at later time points. To examine if the diagnostic sensitivity of antibody tests falls off, we compared the sensitivity of two nucleoprotein-based antibody tests, the Roche Elecsis II Anti-SARS-CoV-2 and the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay and three glycoprotein-based tests, the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant, Siemens Atellica IM COV2T and Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 assay with 53 sera obtained 6 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection. The sensitivity of the Roche, Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant and Siemens antibody assays was 94.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 84.3-98.8%), 98.1 % (95% CI: 89.9-100%) and 100 % (95% CI: 93.3-100%). The sensitivity of the N-based Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG and the glycoprotein-based Euroimmun ELISA was 45.3 % (95% CI: 31.6-59.6%) and 83.3% (95% CI: 70.2-91.9%). The nucleoprotein-based Roche and the glycoprotein-based Abbott receptor binding domain (RBD) and Siemens tests were more sensitive than the N-based Abbott and the Euroimmun antibody tests (p = 0.0001 to p = 0.039). The N-based Abbott antibody test was less sensitive 6 months than 4-10 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 infection (p = 0.0001). The findings show that most SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays correctly identified previous infection 6 months after infection. The sensitivity of pan-Ig antibody tests was not reduced at 6 months when IgM antibodies have usually disappeared. However, one of the nucleoprotein-based antibody tests significantly lost diagnostic sensitivity over time.

An update on lateral flow immunoassay for the rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.

Over the last three years, after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, an unprecedented number of novel diagnostic tests have been developed. Assays to evaluate the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 have been widely considered as part of the control strategy. The lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA), to detect both IgM and IgG against SARS-CoV-2, has been widely studied as a point-of-care (POC) test. Compared to laboratory tests, LFIAs are faster, cheaper and user-friendly, thus available also in areas with low economic resources. Soon after the onset of the pandemic, numerous kits for rapid antibody detection were put on the market with an emergency use authorization. However, since then, scientists have tried to better define the accuracy of these tests and their usefulness in different contexts. In fact, while during the first phase of the pandemic LFIAs for antibody detection were auxiliary to molecular tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19, successively these tests became a tool of seroprevalence surveillance to address infection control policies. When in 2021 a massive vaccination campaign was implemented worldwide, the interest in LFIA reemerged due to the need to establish the extent and the longevity of immunization in the vaccinated population and to establish priorities to guide health policies in low-income countries with limited access to vaccines. Here, we summarize the accuracy, the advantages and limits of LFIAs as POC tests for antibody detection, highlighting the efforts that have been made to improve this technology over the last few years.

COVID-19 serology-based testing in pericarditis: a case report

Recently published studies have shown that cardiac complications are not uncommon in patients with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) disease. We describe the case of a 55-year-old female presenting with chest pain after having had influenza-like symptoms. Chest computed tomography showed a circumferential pericardial effusion, confirmed by transthoracic echocardiography with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction. The nasopharyngeal swab was negative, but the use of a rapid test identified COVID-19 antibodies, revealing the infectious cause of the pericarditis.Copyright © EMH Schweizerischer Arzteverlag AG. All Rights Reserved.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan of the Brain After Mild COVID-19 Infection.

PURPOSE: There have been several reports of central nervous system impairments associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection on head magnetic resonance imaging and angiography (MRI/A). However, head MRI/A is rarely performed in mild cases, and there have been few reports on intracranial changes after COVID-19 infection in these cases. Here, we report a comparative examination of the findings seen in common head MRI/A sequences in mild cases of COVID-19. METHODS: Of the 15,376 patients who underwent head MRI/A examination called "Brain Dock" between June 2020 and June 2021, 746 patients who received a COVID-19 antibody test were evaluated. Positive and negative patients were comparatively examined for head MRI/A findings such as cerebral white matter lesions, ischemic changes, cerebral microbleeds, cerebral aneurysms, arterial stenosis, sinusitis, and other abnormal findings. RESULTS: Overall, 31 (4.2%) patients were COVID-19 positive, and all of them had mild infections not requiring hospitalization. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics and head MRI/A findings between positive and negative patients. All positive patients showed no particular abnormalities in the nasal findings such as olfactory bulb atrophy or thickening of the olfactory mucosa. CONCLUSION: Intracranial lesions in mild patients do not show a clear difference from those in negative patients. This indicates that findings seen in common MRI/A sequences of severe patients are not likely in mild patients, supporting that there is relatively no damage to the central nervous system in mild patients.

Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine induces the production of cross-reactive antibodies against Trypanosoma cruzi proteins: A preliminary study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the presence of cross-reactivity by anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibodies induced by the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine against Trypanosoma cruzi proteins in a screening test. METHODS: Forty-three serum samples were obtained from personnel at the Hospital General Naval de Alta Especialidad in Mexico City who received one or two doses of the vaccine and were tested for T. cruzi infection using four tests: two 'in house' enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), a commercial ELISA diagnostic kit and an immunoblot test. RESULTS: IgG antibodies against the T. cruzi proteins were present in the serum of unvaccinated subjects and subjects who had received one or two doses of the vaccine. The positivity of the samples against T. cruzi was ruled out by means of a Western Blot assay, where all samples were negative for T. cruzi. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that people convalescing from coronavirus disease 2019 and those who received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine exhibit cross-reactive antibodies against T. cruzi antigens in ELISA assays.

A Brief Questionnaire on Healthcare Workers' Awareness Toward the COVID-19 Vaccine and Antibody Tests

In 2022, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to spread worldwide with the emergence of many variants. Healthcare workers (HCWs) are en-couraged to be vaccinated against COVID-19 because vaccines provide powerful protection from serious ill-nesses, hospitalization, and death. However, breakthrough infections on vaccinees have been frequently reported, and more studies are required to understand the mechanism of breakthrough infection and estab-lish a standard neutralizing antibody (NTAb) level with efficacy. In particular, it is important to develop useful research tools for HCWs at high risk of breakthrough infection. Here, we administered a brief questionnaire on awareness of COVID-19 vaccines and antibody tests to uncover the needs of HCWs. Our questionnaire showed that HCWs felt a lower prior-ity for vaccines among infection control measures than non-HCWs. On the other hand, HCWs expected more strongly the vaccine to be effective in preventing infection at work than non-HCWs. About half of the re-spondents, whether HCWs or not, thought that there was a correlation between the severity of adverse re-actions and the degree of antibody induction. About 20% of the respondents had a change in awareness of the correlation after an antibody survey. Many respondents believed that the antibody test would be use-ful. Therefore, we should contribute to the development of a method of evaluating vaccines that can pro-tect against infection and to improving other infection control measures in the future. © Fuji Technology Press Ltd.

Development and Validation of a Rapid Screening Test for HTLV-I IgG Antibodies.

Initial diagnosis of human T cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV) infections is mainly based by detecting antibodies in plasma or serum using laboratory-based methods. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a rapid screening test for HTLV-I antibodies. Our rapid screening test uses HTLV-I p24 antigen conjugated to gold nanoparticles and an anti-human IgG antibody immobilized to a nitrocellulose strip to detect human HTLV-I p24-specific IgG antibodies via immunochromatography. Performance of the rapid screening test for HTLV-I was conducted on a total of 118 serum specimens collected in Salvador, Bahia, the epicenter for HTLV-1 infection in Brazil. Using a Western blot test as the comparator, 55 serum specimens were HTLV-I positive, 5 were HTLV-I and HTLV-II positive, and 58 were negative. The sensitivity of the rapid screening test for HTLV-1 was 96.7% and the specificity was 100%. The rapid screening test did not show cross-reaction with serum specimens from individuals with potentially interfering infections including those caused by HTLV-II, HIV-I, HIV-II, hepatitis A virus, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, herpes simplex virus, Epstein-Barr virus, SARS-CoV-2, Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Treponema pallidum, Toxoplasma gondii, and Plasmodium falciparum. The rapid screening test also did not show cross-reaction with potentially interfering substances. Strategies for HTLV diagnosis in non- and high-endemic areas can be improved with low-cost, rapid screening tests.

The Deceptive COVID-19: Lessons from Common Molecular Diagnostics and a Novel Plan for the Prevention of the Next Pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic took place during the years 2020-2022 and the virus, named SARS-CoV-2, seems likely to have resulted in an endemic disease. Nevertheless, widespread COVID-19 has given rise to several major molecular diagnostics' facts and concerns that have emerged during the overall management of this disease and the subsequent pandemic. These concerns and lessons are undeniably critical for the prevention and control of future infectious agents. Furthermore, most populaces were introduced to several new public health maintenance strategies, and again, some critical events arose. The purpose of this perspective is to thoroughly analyze all these issues and the concerns, such as the molecular diagnostics' terminologies, their role, as well as the quantity and quality issues with a molecular diagnostics' test result. Furthermore, it is speculated that society will be more vulnerable in the future and prone to emerging infectious diseases; thus, a novel preventive medicine's plan for the prevention and control of future (re)emerging infectious diseases is presented, so as to aid the early prevention of future epidemics and pandemics.

Detection of Antibody versus Antigen, Optimal Option of Different Serological Assays Based Tests for COVID-19 Diagnosis: A Meta-Analysis

Background: In this study, the diagnostic efficacy of antigen test and antibody test were assessed. Additional-ly, the difference of sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were compared concerning efficacy of antibody test versus antigen test for Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis. Methods: Online databases were searched for full-text publications and STATA software was used for data pooling and analysis before Sep 1st, 2022. Forrest plot was used to show the pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio. Combined receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to show the area of under curve of complex data. Results: Overall, 25 studies were included. The sensitivity (0.68, 95% CI: 0.53-0.80) and specificity (0.99, 95% CI: 0.98-0.99) in antibody or antigen was calculated. The time point of test lead to heterogeneity. The area under curve (AUC) was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99), and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 299.54 (95% CI: 135.61-661.64). Subgroup analysis indicated antibody test with sensitivity (0.59, 95% CI: 0.44-0.73) and specificity (0.98, 95% CI: 0.95-0.99) and antigen test with sensitivity of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.53-0.91) and specificity of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-1.00). Higher AUC and DOR were proved in antigen test. Conclusion: The present study compared the efficacy of antibody test versus antigen test for COVID-19 di-agnosis. Better diagnostic efficacy, lower heterogeneity, and less publication bias of rapid antigen testing was suggested in this study. This study would help us to make better strategy about choosing rapid and reliable testing method in diagnosis of the COVID-19 disease. © 2023 Fu et al. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

Evaluating the value of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection and neutralizing responses with euvirus: A population of 10776 close contacts in the epidemic of Fujian.

BACKGROUND: Nucleic acid detection represents limitations due to its false-negative rate and technical complexity in the COVID-19 pandemic. Anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody tests are widely spread all over the world presently. However, there is no report on the effectiveness of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing methods in China. METHODS: We gathered 10776 serum samples from close contacts of the SARS-CoV-2 infections in Fujian of China and used 2 chemiluminescence immunoassays (Wantai Bio., Yahuilong Bio.) and 2 lateral flow immunoassays (Lizhu Bio. and Dongfang Bio.) to perform the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests in China. RESULTS: The 4 antibody tests have great diagnostic value for infected or uninfected, especially in the neutralizing antibodies tests, the AUC can reach 0.939 (Wantai Bio.) and 0.916 (Yahuilong Bio.). Furthermore, we used pseudoviruses and euvirus neutralization assay to validate the effectiveness of these antibody test, the results of pseudoviruses neutralization assay or euvirus neutralization assay shows a considerable correlation with the 4 antibody detection respectively, particularly in euvirus neutralization assay, neutralizing antibodies detected by Wantai Bio. or Yahuilong Bio., the correlation can get the level of 0.93 or 0.82. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study demonstrate that the detections of antibodies have profound value in the diagnosis of COVID-19.

Implementing Rapid Antibody Test to Identify Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection as Initial Screening in Admitting Pregnant Women, Yes or No?

Introduction: Assessing patient history is solely insufficient to identify the asymptomatic Covid-19 cases in pregnancy. Therefore, regular laboratory examinations should be deemed to find the actual case. However, this strategy might be more challenging for a limited-resource area. Hence, finding the most effective laboratory screening is beneficial. This study aimed to collate the effectiveness of rapid antibody and universal reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for asymptomatic Covid-19 testing among pregnant women in low-resource settings. Methods: We performed a study using one-year retrospective data of asymptomatic Covid-19 cases among pregnant women admitted in Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital Surabaya, conducted with the paired rapid antibody test and RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 result. Results: Of 265 cases included, 217 samples had a reactive rapid antibody test (81.89%). There was a significant association between rapid antibody test and RT-PCR (p=0.026) with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were 89%, 22%, 38%, and 79%, respectively. Thus, it can identify more asymptomatic cases compared to identification by history and symptoms only. This study also revealed a higher significant efficiency cost (p<0.001) by reducing the overall expense up to IDR 36, 180, 000 (USD 2, 514) or 15% lower than the universal RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 testing strategy. Conclusion: This study suggests that implementing a rapid antibody test has favour in identifying more asymptomatic Covid-19 cases in pregnancy and evince more cost-effective than universal PCR testing. © 2022 UPM Press. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of hemodialysis patients and hemodialysis health workers with COVID-19 IgM and IgG antibody test; a multicenter study from Eskisehir, Turkiye.

OBJECTIVE: Hemodialysis (HD) patients are a population at high risk for exposure to the severe respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. Undiagnosed mild or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in HD patients can make these patients a potential source of infection. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the entire spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 infection with the IgM and IgG rapid antibody kit in HD patients and healthcare providers working in HD unit. METHODS: 633 HD patients and 134 health workers from all dialysis centers (three private and three public) in Eskisehir were included in the study. Blood samples obtained from participants were allowed to clot for 30 min at room temperature at 15°C using a serum separator tube. Then it was centrifuged at 1000 g at 2-8°C for 15 min. The supernatant was collected and the samples were stored at -20°C until use. Serum samples stored at the end of the study were studied with the A.B.T.™ Biotechnology COVID-19 Rapid IgG-IgM Diagnostic Test. Routine examination was measured by standard methods. All participants were evaluated by serological analysis of IgG and IgM antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 recombinant antigen. RESULTS: Two symptomatic HD patients (0.27%) were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection by real-time reverse-transcription-polymerase-chain - reaction test and chest tomography. In 15 (2.36%) of 633 asymptomatic patients, antibody was positive against the SARS-CoV recombinant antigen (IgG in 13, both IgG and IgM in 2), while no antibodies were detected in 134 health workers. CONCLUSION: We have shown that most HD patients with SARS-CoV-2 experience the disease asymptomatically, and that antibody testing plays an important role in identifying patients with asymptomatic infection.

A RARE CASE OF COVID-19-INDUCED AORTITIS

SESSION TITLE: Post-COVID-19 Infection Complications SESSION TYPE: Case Report Posters PRESENTED ON: 10/17/2022 12:15 pm - 01:15 pm INTRODUCTION: Aortitis is a type of vasculitis that refers to inflammation of the aortic wall. Most common causes are rheumatologic disorders and bacterial infection. Here, we report a viral cause of aortitis induced by COVID-19. CASE PRESENTATION: A 73 year old female with history of coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, COPD, hypertension, pulmonary embolism on Eliquis and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) status post repair presented with acute hypoxemia secondary to Covid-19 pneumonia. Of note, patient was vaccinated against COVID-19. CT abdomen at admission demonstrated a known infrarenal AAA with increased degree aortic wall thickening, concerning for aortitis. Aortitis was initially thought to be due to endovascular infection from possible bacteremia rather than surgical site infection as the patient had the AAA repair almost a year prior. Given that bacterial aortitis could result in death, blood cultures were obtained and she was started on Vancomycin and Rocephin. Rapid Plasma Reagin was ordered to rule out syphilis. She had titer of 1-2 which was thought to be false positive as fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test was negative. After blood cultures and inflammatory markers were negative, antibiotics were discontinued. Aortitis was attributed to COVID. Patient was treated with DEXA-ARDS protocol. Repeat CT abdomen after 8 days no longer showed gross evidence of aortitis. Patient was discharged home with home healthcare. DISCUSSION: Aortitis, a rare complication of COVID-19, has been reported. A proposed mechanism of this pathogenesis involves acute endotheliitis, where endothelial cells infected by virions become infiltrated by neutrophils and mononuclear cells, leading to apoptosis and lymphocytic endotheliitis [1]. Later, these arteries move through the stages of an accelerated karyolysis, accumulation of apoptotic bodies, caspase granules, and fibrinoid substances, leading to leukocytoclastic vasculitis [1]. This inflammatory reaction is followed by deposition of polyclonal antigen-antibody immune complexes, which is a type III hypersensitivity acute vasculitis [2]. Our patient's history of AAA repair predisposed her to increased endothelial dysfunction. After other bacterial infectious causes and post-surgical complications were ruled out, patient was treated with steroids. Most cases of COVID induced aortitis have been treated with prednisone that required treatment for around 1 month [3]. Here, we present a patient treated with DEXA-ARDS with resolution of aortitis. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the novelty, the understanding of exact pathogenesis and long term effects of COVID-19 induced aortitis is limited. However, our case does serve to support prior case reports of COVID-19 aortitis that showed clinical and radiologic response to steroids. Further research is warranted to diagnose and treat aortitis in order to avoid life threating complications. Reference #1: Varga, Zsuzsanna, et al. "Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID-19.” The Lancet 395.10234 (2020): 1417-1418. Reference #2: Roncati, Luca, et al. "Type 3 hypersensitivity in COVID-19 vasculitis.” (2020): 108487-108489. Reference #3: Dhakal, Pravash et al. "Aortitis in COVID-19.” IDCases vol. 24 (2021): e01063. doi:10.1016/j.idcr.2021.e01063 DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Jessica Lee No relevant relationships by Thong Ngo No relevant relationships by Marrian Sedrak No relevant relationships by Hena Yagnik

Validation of the COVID-19 IgG/IgM Rapid Test Cassette (BNCP - 402 and BNCP402) in a South African setting.

Background: Different diagnostic tools could improve early detection of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A number of antibody-based serological point-of-care tests have been developed to supplement real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based diagnosis. This study describes the validity of an antibody test, namely the immunoglobulin G (IgG)/immunoglobulin M (IgM) Rapid Test Cassette® (BNCP - 402 and BNCP402), manufactured by Spring Healthcare Services. Methods: A prospective cohort validation study was undertaken at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital between 16 July 2020 and 12 August 2020. A total of 101 patients admitted as COVID-19 cases under investigation were included in the study. They were divided into two categories depending on time since symptom onset: testing performed within seven days (early cohort) and after seven days (late cohort). The rapid antibody test was compared to the RT-PCR. Results: Overall, the test has a sensitivity and specificity of 85.2% and 80.0%, respectively, for a combination of IgG and IgM. Sensitivity and specificity of IgG testing alone were 81.5% and 85%. Sensitivity improved for testing with increasing time from symptom onset; however, specifity was not significantly different. Conclusion: The study data adds to the body of evidence that because of relatively low sensitivity and specificity, there is a limited role for antibody-based point-of-care testing in the acute phase of COVID-19 infection, as was the case with this IgG/IgM Rapid Test Cassette (BNCP - 402 and BNCP402). There may exist a role for such testing in patients recovered from prior COVID-19 infection or in seroprevalence studies; however, additional evaluations at later timepoints from symptom onset are required.

Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among university athletic club members: A cross-sectional survey.

School-based coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) testing is an important part of a comprehensive prevention strategy in public health. To assess the prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies in a university athletic club community with repeated occurrences of SARS-CoV-2 infections, we conducted a cross-sectional survey for asymptomatic antibody prevalence using a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antibody test kit. On January 26, 2021 we administered questionnaires to determine their history of contact with infected individuals and took blood samples from 129 undergraduates. The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among the subjects was 3.9%. Only 6.2% of the participants reported close contact with infected individuals. In this study, we clarified the prevalence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in university athletic clubs where SARS-CoV-2 infections had repeatedly occurred, which will be helpful in discussing how to identify and prevent the transmission of infections within university athletic club communities.

A longitudinal study of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence in a random sample of the general population in Hiroshima in 2020.

BACKGROUND: This longitudinal study aimed to determine chronological changes in the seroprevalence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, including asymptomatic infections in Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. METHODS: A stratified random sample of 7,500 residents from five cities of Hiroshima Prefecture was selected to participate in a three-round survey from late 2020 to early 2021, before the introduction of the COVID-19 vaccine. The seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was calculated if at least two of four commercially available immunoassays were positive. Then, the ratio between seroprevalence and the prevalence of confirmed COVID-19 cases in Hiroshima was calculated and compared to the results from other prefectures where the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare conducted a survey by using the same reagents at almost the same period. RESULTS: The numbers of participants in the first, second, and third rounds of the survey were 3025, 2396, and 2351, respectively and their anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies seroprevalences were 0.03% (95% confidence interval: 0.00-0.10%), 0.08% (0.00-0.20%), and 0.30% (0.08-0.52%), respectively. The ratio between the seroprevalence and the prevalence of confirmed COVID-19 cases in Hiroshima was 1.2, which was smaller than that in similar studies in other prefectures. CONCLUSIONS: The seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Hiroshima increased tenfold in a half year. The difference between seroprevalence and the prevalence of confirmed COVID-19 cases in Hiroshima was smaller than that in other prefectures, suggesting that asymptomatic patients were more actively detected in Hiroshima.